Page 1 of 1

Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 16th, 2014, 3:08 pm
by Hoxnan
My little brother and some friends came up to visit this past weekend so we decided to head down to the coast to do some wade-fishing. We ended up on Ochlockonee Bay and it wasn't long before we found some action. We got into a few schools of pup reds, and we eventually found some of size. We ended up with three slot redfish (a 19" , 21" , and a 25 1/2" my brother's buddy James caught) along with a pile of smaller ones. We had the 21" and the 25 1/2" red on the stringer until two of my buddies each caught a keeper flounder, at which time we decided to let the reds swim away to see another day :thumbup: All in all it was a good day with good company, you can't really ask for much more.

Image
James' Redfish

Image
These are the Flounder

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 16th, 2014, 3:54 pm
by 2true
:thumbup:

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 16th, 2014, 5:29 pm
by reelbad
Not to good to put a fish of any kind on a stringer and then decide to release it. It may swim away ok but it still may not survive. BTW, why release a red just because you caught the flounder.?

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 16th, 2014, 8:31 pm
by SS-342
Looks like you had a good day and caught a nice mess of fish. Enjoyed reading your report.

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 12:36 pm
by Hoxnan
reelbad wrote:Not to good to put a fish of any kind on a stringer and then decide to release it. It may swim away ok but it still may not survive. BTW, why release a red just because you caught the flounder.?
While that is a fair point, I completely disagree. They were strung through the bottom lip as to not damage their gills and they swam off in a very lively manner after being revived. I string them that way ahead of time to keep them lively in case I catch something more valuable (in my opinion) and would rather release them. And I released the reds because (personally) I find flounder to be far superior table fare, and seeing as we already had a mess of grouper and snapper waiting to fry up at home, why would I want to take more than I need? Sure, I could have kept the reds just to save the fillets, but I already had meat so i'd prefer to let the fish grow to be caught (or breed) another day. I had enough to feed my family and myself that evening with the flounder so why be greedy?

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 12:47 pm
by Gulf Coast
Just wondering, If puting fish on a stringer is the same as putting them in a cooler/livewell as it relates to culling ?

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 12:49 pm
by Salty Gator
Hoxnan wrote:
reelbad wrote:Not to good to put a fish of any kind on a stringer and then decide to release it. It may swim away ok but it still may not survive. BTW, why release a red just because you caught the flounder.?
While that is a fair point, I completely disagree. They were strung through the bottom lip as to not damage their gills and they swam off in a very lively manner after being revived. I string them that way ahead of time to keep them lively in case I catch something more valuable (in my opinion) and would rather release them. And I released the reds because (personally) I find flounder to be far superior table fare, and seeing as we already had a mess of grouper and snapper waiting to fry up at home, why would I want to take more than I need? Sure, I could have kept the reds just to save the fillets, but I already had meat so i'd prefer to let the fish grow to be caught (or breed) another day. I had enough to feed my family and myself that evening with the flounder so why be greedy?
:thumbup:

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 1:00 pm
by SHOWBOAT
Gulf Coast wrote:Just wondering, If puting fish on a stringer is the same as putting them in a cooler/livewell as it relates to culling ?
I wouldn't consider this culling b/c he didn't replace them. I also wouldn't call it wasting b/c he gave his limit the best chance at survival.

Good report, and nice job of taking only what you want to eat fresh!

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 1:08 pm
by charlie tuna
Thank you for thinking about future fish generations SIR !! And after days of consideration, over this post, I have come to the conclusion that - THAT Red had a MUCH better chance at survival, being released, EVEN AFTER BEING ON YOUR STRINGER, than it would inside your freezer. Thanks again !

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 1:19 pm
by Rhettley
Good report and some nice fish!

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 8:12 pm
by Troutbster
Nice report, well done.

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 17th, 2014, 9:22 pm
by Hoxnan
Thanks to all for the kind words!
charlie tuna wrote:Thank you for thinking about future fish generations SIR !! And after days of consideration, over this post, I have come to the conclusion that - THAT Red had a MUCH better chance at survival, being released, EVEN AFTER BEING ON YOUR STRINGER, than it would inside your freezer. Thanks again !
& I couldn't agree more! :thumbup:

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 20th, 2014, 3:36 pm
by Williamsdad
Looks a lot like Bald Point to me. Well done.

Re: Wade Fishing Ochlockonee Bay

Posted: June 21st, 2014, 7:01 am
by MudDucker
SHOWBOAT wrote:
Gulf Coast wrote:Just wondering, If puting fish on a stringer is the same as putting them in a cooler/livewell as it relates to culling ?
I wouldn't consider this culling b/c he didn't replace them. I also wouldn't call it wasting b/c he gave his limit the best chance at survival.

Good report, and nice job of taking only what you want to eat fresh!
X2