I think yer a few years late for thatrjohnson wrote: Don't mind me, I'm just here to deface Tom's Web site. I'm a product of Georgia, myself




Moderators: bman, Chalk, Tom Keels
I think yer a few years late for thatrjohnson wrote: Don't mind me, I'm just here to deface Tom's Web site. I'm a product of Georgia, myself
Hmmm....how many idiots do you know that buy expensive Florida land for cheapSeachaser wrote:The problem is not the water, but politicians. They only plan after the fact. Atlanta and northward have known for the past century that they do not have enough water. They should have done like I did and drill a dang well! Purdue is a crook, and idiot. After all he bought a huge amount of "cheap" Florida land! LOL
MudDucker wrote:Bottom line is that the corp is releasing more water than is coming in, thereby giving the downstream folks more water than they would have if there was a natural flow of water. That isn't right.
The stupid corp didn't even accurately measure its release until about 6 months ago, when some employee checked and the release gauges were bad wrong. Corp released 2 billion gallons too much.
Agreed, but this time, it seems they haven't built enough structures to store water for Atlanta.EddieJoe wrote:The Corps is and always has been oriented towards engineering solutions to complex problems. They think structures first: dams, weirs, dredges. Throw in the "home town" politicians desire to bring back huge public projects to the district that employ thousands and you see where it leads. As they did in Florida with draining the Everglades, building the Cross-Florida Barge Canal and nowadays beach renourishment, the Corps will build it and then fix it later. Tends to keep them busy forever.
First off, God sends the excess water south, not Georgia. My understanding of the current agreement was that the flow south would not be less than what the natural flow would be.EddieJoe wrote:The water agreement between the three states is complicated, and everyone was supposed to give up something and gain something in the process. Florida is supposed to get a guaranteed amount of water during low water times and Georgia can send a lot south when they are flooding there.
The problem is a riparian waters right problem. Enough water is generated by God's rainfall in Georgia to support Atlanta and all of Georgia. Right now, enough water is not falling to support that and the downstream folks. Historically, all downstream folks sucked hind tit. That would be the case in this instance if Georgia had not accepted federal money for dams. The solution will be costly and since folks from outside the State of Georgia are now dictating where Georgia's water is used, money from outside should be applied to fix the problem.EddieJoe wrote:And, while the Atlanta politicians like to call this a "mussell" problem, south Georgia also needs the water, too, as does Alabama. IMO, Atlanta has brought this entirely upon itself, while making billions off of unplanned growth. I would bet that any future solutions will involve plenty of public money, and it will come from outside Atlanta, in large measure.
EJ
I'm one of the oppressed minority....a white middle class married taxpayerwevans wrote:I'm really surprised that someone hasn't thrown in the race card yet, since much of Atlanta is of the racist claiming kindand yes I know that makes me sound racist, I DON'T CARE ANYMORE
any time that a "minority" don't get their way, they just holler RACISM and everybody starts kissing their butts
and I bet that it will be hollered about this also if they decide they need that ace in-the-hole
![]()
Actually, most of South Georgia and north central Florida don't use any rivers for their water supply. We are all using one of the world's largest aquifers. I don't think Atlanta is gonna run a pipe down hereTy one on wrote:Everybody,
This is not a Georgia vs. Florida thing at all. It is a North Georgia and the City of Atlanta vs. Central Georgia, South Georgia, Alabama and Florida thing.