Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife

This section is for our members to talk about things not actually about fishing or boating. However, please read the Code of Conduct before posting.
Image

Moderators: bman, Chalk, Tom Keels

Post Reply
User avatar
jadams92002
Site Sponsor
Posts: 371
Joined: March 29th, 2009, 1:01 pm
Location: Bainbridge

Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife

Post by jadams92002 »

GON Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife
This information is important.

More important is your action.

Please see below and follow through on this issue and MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD.

Sincerely,

Steve Burch
Georgia Outdoor News

EPA Considering Ban on Traditional Ammunition: ACT NOW!!
All Gun Owners, Hunters and Shooters:

With the fall hunting season fast approaching, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Lisa Jackson, who was responsible for banning bear hunting in New Jersey, is now considering a petition by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) - a leading anti-hunting organization - to ban all traditional ammunition under the Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976, a law in which Congress expressly exempted ammunition. If the EPA approves the petition, the result will be a total ban on all ammunition containing lead-core components, including hunting and target-shooting rounds. The EPA must decide to accept or reject this petition by November 1, 2010, the day before the midterm elections.

Today, the EPA has opened to public comment the CBD petition. The comment period ends on October 31, 2010.

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) -- the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry -- urges you to submit comment to the EPA opposing any ban on traditional ammunition. Remember, your right to choose the ammunition you hunt and shoot with is at stake.

The EPA has published the petition and relevant supplemental information as Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0681. If you would like to read the original petition and see the contents of this docket folder, please click here. In order to go directly to the 'submit a comment' page for this docket number, please click here.

NSSF urges you to stress the following in your opposition:

•There is no scientific evidence that the use of traditional ammunition is having an adverse impact on wildlife populations.
•Wildlife management is the proper jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services and the 50 state wildlife agencies.
•A 2008 study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on blood lead levels of North Dakota hunters confirmed that consuming game harvested with traditional ammunition does not pose a human health risk.
•A ban on traditional ammunition would have a negative impact on wildlife conservation. The federal excise tax that manufacturers pay on the sale of the ammunition (11 percent) is a primary source of wildlife conservation funding. The bald eagle's recovery, considered to be a great conservation success story, was made possible and funded by hunters using traditional ammunition - the very ammunition organizations like the CBD are now demonizing.
•Recent statistics from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service show that from 1981 to 2006 the number of breeding pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased 724 percent. And much like the bald eagle, raptor populations throughout the United States are soaring.
Steps to take:

1.Submit comment online to the EPA.
2.Contact Lisa Jackson directly to voice your opposition to the ban:

Lisa P. Jackson
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 564-4700
Fax: (202) 501-1450
Email: jackson.lisa@epa.gov

3.Contact your congressman and senators and urge them to stop the EPA from banning ammunition. To view a sample letter, click here.
KYFRED
Posts: 93
Joined: May 14th, 2008, 5:04 pm

Re: Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife

Post by KYFRED »

This was rejected by EPA last week on the grounds that it would become a second amendment issue and they did nto want to infringe.
User avatar
Eerman
Site Sponsor
Posts: 3671
Joined: February 11th, 2004, 9:05 pm
Location: Tallahassee

Re: Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife

Post by Eerman »

My understanding is that the ban on lead fishing tackle has not been rejected and is still a possibility.
"Why does Sea World have a seafood restaurant?? I'm halfway through my fish burger and I realize, Oh man....I could be eating a slow learner."
User avatar
Harmsway
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2007
Joined: March 1st, 2009, 11:14 am
Location: Tallahassee

Re: Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife

Post by Harmsway »

To fish, or not to fish, . . . those are the answers.
User avatar
jadams92002
Site Sponsor
Posts: 371
Joined: March 29th, 2009, 1:01 pm
Location: Bainbridge

Re: Call for Action as EPA attacks Sportsmen/Wildlife

Post by jadams92002 »

I got the email on Monday the 30th from Georgia Outdoor News. I just thought I would share.
Post Reply