



Moderators: bman, Chalk, Tom Keels
And as I said, althought not directly, but now I will, there is a middle ground out there somewhere. Like Barry said, there also has to be common sense. If the extreme environmentalist had their way, all oil wells land and sea would be shut down tomorrow. Likewise, with NO controls, Oil companies would spill recklessly.EddieJoe wrote:Dubble:
I'm going to stay out of this fussing match you Georgia boys have going on with Mr. Gumbo, but I couldn't help myself when you start cherry picking something out of a press release regarding crude and the Gulf of Mexico. If your purpose was to compare the detrimental environmental effects of the spill vs. natural seeps in the Gulf and portray them as similar, you are mistaken. It has been known for many years that there are natural seeps in the Gulf, but they are relatively small in total discharge per unit area and widely distributed. Perhaps their total discharge is somewhat similar, but the release of millions of gallons of crude at one deep water location has impacts that are vastly different and far more detrimental. Add to that, the feds and the well operators had and still have no earthly idea what habitats or wildlife were common where the spill took place, because no one takes a look down there as part of the permit. Since that time, researchers have been trying to piece together what probably existed based on similar areas elsewhere, but mostly it is the oil guys that have the $ and the equipment to properly analyze resources at that kind of depth, not anyone else. Facts are, since I used to be part of the Florida response team, that no current technology exists for containing or properly responding (meaning quick response to a deep water event, shutting the unit, stopping the spread of oil, etc.) to a deep water spill, period. And yet we continue to operate and drill deeper and deeper, because the money to be made is enormous, so we lie to ourselves and pretend that such drilling can be "safe" to the resources of the Gulf. It can't, at this stage, but we as a nation are more than willing to sell out the Gulf for the oil. It's the truth, no matter what or who is in charge politically.
It's real handy not to know what you destroy, because then you can't be accountable for destroying anything if something goes wrong. Despite all of the hoorah after the big spill, things are pretty much back to normal as far as deep water drilling in the Gulf. Open season, MOL, after a "decent interval" for the dead stuff to go away and for people to forget enough. That is, until the next major spill, when everyone will moan and point fingers (and this includes politicians of both parties) but not much really will be done to mitigate or preclude another one.
EJ
Not blaming anyone. Just stating what I was told by someone who knows more about it than myself.wevans wrote:UMMM, BP was ALLOWED to use chemicals to sink the oil out of sight by the government!! You can't blame them for using what the gov. allows em to use "despite the chemicals being banned from use previously"That is all I'm gonna say on this one
![]()
![]()
This mentality is so dangerous and explains a lot about the popular stances taken on this forum. To put it in simple terms, we don't need to do a damn thing about the environment and worry about our children and grand children's future because an imaginary god is going to fix it all.RHTFISH wrote:No data, stats, policies, agendas impress me like a glimpse of God's ability!Dubble Trubble wrote:Gumbo wrote:And what about my attitude is it, sir? Is it simply that I voice beliefs that differ from yours? Is it that I conclude, based on sound data, that we as a society have caused and continue to cause great harm to our ecosystems? Point out one thing I have said that is incorrect based on the facts. Nature will not magically recover. God will not wave a magic wand and fix everything. It's not an attitude. It's the truth.
He has done it before, and can do it again. Look up Chicxulub. You think Waaaaayyyyy to highly of yourself as a human.
Dubble
What mentality? There you go again, as Reagan would say. I was making a point about how mother nature will take care of herself. If we humans destroy the environment, so be it. When we are extinct, I assure you life WILL go on. You act as though most of us on here could care less about the environment. I call B/S! We all are sporstmen and probably care more and actually DO more than most "environmentalists".mastercaster wrote:RHTFISH wrote:No data, stats, policies, agendas impress me like a glimpse of God's ability!Dubble Trubble wrote:Gumbo wrote:And what about my attitude is it, sir? Is it simply that I voice beliefs that differ from yours? Is it that I conclude, based on sound data, that we as a society have caused and continue to cause great harm to our ecosystems? Point out one thing I have said that is incorrect based on the facts. Nature will not magically recover. God will not wave a magic wand and fix everything. It's not an attitude. It's the truth.
He has done it before, and can do it again. Look up Chicxulub. You think Waaaaayyyyy to highly of yourself as a human.
Dubble
This mentality is so dangerous and explains a lot about the popular stances taken on this forum. To put it in simple terms, we don't need to do a damn thing about the environment and worry about our children and grand children's future because an imaginary god is going to fix it all.
By the way, you might want to pick something other than the Chicxulub crater to reference as god's magic wand. It was created +/- 66 million years ago, well before the earth was created. Something doesn't add up...