Page 2 of 3
Posted: January 14th, 2007, 9:08 pm
by Jumptrout51
By catch.

Posted: January 14th, 2007, 9:42 pm
by jsuber
Good catch there JT. Gulp works!
Posted: January 15th, 2007, 9:26 am
by catchin1
After all that big posting Friday about going I expected a little more report than that....you didn't mention anything about the beer.

Posted: January 15th, 2007, 5:11 pm
by Jumptrout51
catchin1 wrote:After all that big posting Friday about going I expected a little more report than that....you didn't mention anything about the beer.

We took 58,brought back 11.
Posted: January 15th, 2007, 5:24 pm
by birddog
Jumptrout51 wrote:catchin1 wrote:After all that big posting Friday about going I expected a little more report than that....you didn't mention anything about the beer.

We took 58,brought back 11.
Now thats a good report.

Posted: January 15th, 2007, 5:31 pm
by catchin1
Jumptrout51 wrote:catchin1 wrote:After all that big posting Friday about going I expected a little more report than that....you didn't mention anything about the beer.

We took 58,brought back 11.
Drank 47 beers, brought out 7 trout...imagine what you coulda had if you went fishing instead of drinking.

Posted: January 15th, 2007, 5:35 pm
by Jumptrout51
We're conservationists at heart. We don't believe in overfishing.
Posted: January 15th, 2007, 5:38 pm
by birddog
Posted: January 15th, 2007, 5:39 pm
by catchin1

you ain't right

Posted: January 16th, 2007, 10:00 am
by qoutrage
Thks for the rpt.

Posted: January 18th, 2007, 10:00 am
by Littoral
Posted: January 18th, 2007, 10:02 am
by Littoral
Oops, My Bad. Sorry about the

photo up there.
I thought I was replying to the other report from St Marks on 1/13.

Posted: January 18th, 2007, 10:27 am
by tin can
^

Posted: January 18th, 2007, 12:05 pm
by birddog
It works just fine here Lit.

Posted: January 18th, 2007, 5:19 pm
by Jumptrout51
Somebody just needs to put my head on the picture. It looks like what we caught if we had pictures.