Page 1 of 1

90 Ponies v. 115...

Posted: December 7th, 2005, 4:20 pm
by Atticus
The engines (Optis) weigh the same. The price difference is $700. Insurance might go up only a couple bucks over a year. Top end is NOT a factor. Anything else to consider? Resale?

Posted: December 7th, 2005, 6:08 pm
by wevans
Resale, hole shot, cruise the same speed at a lower RPM, thus burning less fuel, higher top-end speed if you need to get in fast :-D I see no minuses for the 115 :thumbup: :thumbup: :beer:

Posted: December 7th, 2005, 7:25 pm
by Atticus
Wife said 'okay' to the extra $700 - chicks must dig more ponies... :thumbup:

Is there anything I am giving up? Anything I can't do with the same engine with less HP?

Posted: December 7th, 2005, 7:28 pm
by dbplug
Other than a few extra Coors Lights, I don't think you are giving up much. BTW, you have a nice wife.

Posted: December 7th, 2005, 8:55 pm
by mjsigns
Go for the ponies-
Ever had to out-run a thunder storm?

PONIES

Posted: December 7th, 2005, 9:25 pm
by FUTCHCAIRO
IT WOULD DEPEND ON THE CONFIGURATION OF YOUR BOAT. TOP END WILL NOT VARY MUCH UNLESS YA HAVE A BIG LOAD. THE HEAVIER THE LOAD IN THE BOAT THE MORE DIFF. YOU WILL SEE. THE 90 PROBABLY WILL GIVE YA ANOTHER 1-1 1/2 MILES PER GALLON OVER THE 115. SINCE YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED TOO MUCH FOR TOP END I WOULD GO FOR THE 90. MY .02
PA (AKA) ALMAR :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Posted: December 8th, 2005, 7:57 am
by dstockwell
Can not see a 90 getting 1 - 1 1/2 more MPG than a 115.

Posted: December 8th, 2005, 8:46 am
by GC
Ever gonna pull a skier, tube, etc? (if the fish aren't biting) If so, the extra horses are a huge benefit.

Gas mileage shouldn't be an issue between the two motors, especially with the Opti's! :thumbup:

Posted: December 8th, 2005, 9:16 am
by catchin1
If there the same weight go for the ponies, better to have em and not em....