Page 1 of 2

Potential World-record bass boated in California

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 9:28 am
by Chalk
World-record bass boated in California
Largemouth tips scale to 25.1 pounds, then is released back into Dixon Lake
By Brett Pauly
ESPNOutdoors.com senior editor — March 20, 2006

Image


He may have released her, but his intentions were good. Now the question beckons: Will Mac Weakley be rewarded with a world record for this 25.1-pound largemouth bass he boated today in southern California.CARLSBAD, Calif. — "Chaos has broken out."

Well, what do you expect when you notify the media that you boated a potential world-record bass?

That was the story at the home of Mac Weakley, who early Monday caught a largemouth on tiny Dixon Lake in southern California that he and his long-time fishing partner, Jed Dickerson, weighed out at 25.1 pounds on a hand-held digital scale.

If that weight stands up it would shatter what is considered to be the granddaddy of angling records — the 22¼-pound largemouth bass taken in 1932 at Georgia's Montgomery Lake by George Washington Perry.

"I feel good, awesome, in fact," said Weakley, 32, of Carlsbad, Calif, who used a white jig with a skirt and rattle on 15-pound line to boat the brute. "I'm just stoked to see a fish that big."

Claimed by many to be a mark that could never be eclipsed, the largemouth-bass record has become the thing of legends. It's the Joe DiMaggio 56-game hitting streak of the angling world.

"It's simply because there are people who are out there who didn't think a bass can grow to more that 22.25 pounds," said James Hall, editor of Bassmaster magazine. "It's because of how elusive the record has been for so many years."

Fortunately for the naysayers, the fish was documented by two anglers with impressive resumes — Weakley and Dickerson each already are officially recognized for boating top-15 bass of all-time at Dixon Lake — and they claim to have witnesses, photo evidence of the catch and video documentation of today's behemoth on the scale.

"There is no smoke and mirrors," Hall said.

Dickerson believes today's 25.1-pounder is the fish that landed him in the No. 4 spot in The Bassmater Top 25 list when he caught her May 31, 2003, at Dixon Lake — a 70-acre impoundment in San Diego County. He knows this because she has the same distinguishing black dot under her right gill plate. Back then she weighed 21.7 pounds.

"It's the same fish I caught three years ago," said Dickerson, 33, a casino-industry employee from Oceanside, Calif. "I knew this was a world record before we even weighed it. It's the biggest, most ferocious bass in that lake, guaranteed."

But, like any good fishing story, this one comes with several sidebars. There's the fact that the fish was foul-hooked. That is wasn't weighed on a certified scale. And, ultimately, that it was released.

All of which will no doubt conspire to make today's catch much more difficult to be recognized as a world record.

Weakley and Dickerson, who fish Dixon Lake as often as five days a week, said they decided to release the spawning fish because they were under the impression it wouldn't qualify as a record because it was foul-hooked.

Jed Dickerson claims the 21.7-pound he caught in 2003 (above) at California's Dixon Lake is the same 25.1-pounder taken today by his angling parter Mac Weakley.Only later did they discover that may not be the case.

"It may still qualify," Hall said. "The IGFA (International Game Fish Association, the most-recognized keeper of angling records) has a pretty vague rule about foul-hooking, which states you cannot intentionally foul-hook a fish."

Weakley now plans to submit his catch for verification by the IGFA, along with photos, video and the scale.

"We didn't know" about the foul-hooking specifics, he said. "Now we are learning other things about it. If you accidentally foul-hook a fish and you instinctively set the hook, apparently it counts."

We'll certainly learn more about it, also, in the coming weeks as the world-record application is processed.

"It's way too early; this one is really up in the air," Hall said. "Ideally it would have been caught in the mouth and ideally it would not have been released and ideally it would have been weighed on a certified scale.

"Ultimately, however, the fact that he boated a 25-pound largemouth needs to be recognized."

As for the catch itself, Dickerson explained that it was raining and dark this morning when they came across the bedding bass in 12 feet of water. A male — often much smaller than a female in the world of spawning bass — also was on the bed, and it made several stabs at the jig. The anglers couldn't tell whether the male or female was hitting the jig when Weakley set the hook at about 6:40 a.m.

The fish surged to deeper water, then raced toward a nearby dock — where, Weakley said, three people, including the dock attendant for the city-owned facility in Escondido, Calif., witnessed the action. There Dickerson missed netting fish with his initial attempt. By this time it was quite apparent that it was the female at line's end, and one extremely large specimen. It again finned to deeper water, and Dickerson followed in their electric-powered rental boat (all that is permitted for use at the 80-foot-deep reservoir).

More evidence of big bass at Dixon Lake: Mike Long registered the largest largemouth in two decades when he boated this bubba in late April 2001.But five minutes after it was hooked, it was in the net. To the anglers' great dismay, the fish had been hooked in its side. Soon after that sad discovery — and determining that its own weight might hurt the fish in the handling process — the pair decided to release it.

"If I kept pulling it out of the water, I don't know if I would have damaged it. This was so big, we thought we were going to break its neck," Weakley said. "But we were confident in the scale. It is without a doubt the world record, so we let it go."

Hall notes that there is the potential for a lot of cash to be associated with a world-record largemouth bass.

"Had they not released the fish alive — and I think releasing it is the right thing to do — I think they might have made quite a bit of money," Hall said. He surmised that there might be sponsorships from the manufacturers of the gear used to catch the bass and payments for guest appearances with the fish mount on display.

Hall said they still could get a plastic replica mount made, "But I don't know where in the hell they are going to get a mount that large."

Whatever happens, Mac Weakley will no doubt become the poster boy for catch and release and, refreshingly, he's all right with that, even if he doesn't break the record or make a dime.

"Would I be disappointed? Not at all," said Weakley, who is a supervisor at a casino in Oceanside. "I feel I'm very blessed; everything I care about is family and friends. I really don't care about money.

"To tell you the truth, I have a good job and I do all right, and I really don't give a (second thought) about it at all. We're more happy just to see that there is a 25-pound bass still living and in this lake."

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 9:51 am
by wevans
You fish five days a week "mainly for a record Bass" and have no plan laid out to keep it alive and healthy while getting it verified :smt017 I gotta call BS on their claim :o that or they are the dumbest fishers to set foot in a boat :smt025

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 9:56 am
by Chalk
No doubt....I believe the world record bhass has a million dollar purse somewhere...not counting sponsors.....Hell...I would of looked like a walking christmas tree with all the tackle on me in that picture :lol: :lol:

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 11:31 am
by dstockwell
If they have all the documentation they say, plus witnesses well then good for him and they should award him the record. What yea gonna do either kill the fish or document and release cause unless you got a "BIG" livewell you carry in the bed of your truck nothin else gonna keep it alive.

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 11:43 am
by MudDucker
wevans wrote:You fish five days a week "mainly for a record Bass" and have no plan laid out to keep it alive and healthy while getting it verified :smt017 I gotta call BS on their claim :o that or they are the dumbest fishers to set foot in a boat :smt025
Weavans, I'm with you :thumbup:

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 11:52 am
by Frank Bradfield
At least its not the usual story " We ate it " . Looks like 25 lbs to me. Not sure about the foul hooking though. The male bass bit and he snatched the female i'd say. Oh well , he didn't want the million anyway !

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 12:49 pm
by leonreno
wevans wrote:You fish five days a week "mainly for a record Bass" and have no plan laid out to keep it alive and healthy while getting it verified :smt017 I gotta call BS on their claim :o that or they are the dumbest fishers to set foot in a boat :smt025
Also, why don't they own a certified scale. You can have any scale certified by the IFGA for a small fee. And I have to say this, though I do catch and release a lot of fish, that fish would have been in a livewell or on ice. My thought is you probably just kept her from spawning, though she may spawn again this season, but she has to be on her very last years of life, probably the last year so why not keep her, perferably alive.

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 1:00 pm
by TroutTrent
Got to agree BS. I'm all about catch and release but come on there's a million dollar award and all the benefits that go with it right now and your going to throw it back,,yea right. Even the dumbest fisherman like Jt51, Chalk or Tin wouldn't do something like that..or would you?

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 1:07 pm
by dstockwell
Lets see, how big is a 25lb bass, alot bigger than the live well in most any fresh water boat, and bigger than most all offshore boats. So unless you run around with a big O livewell in the back of the truck, all the time, just in case you need it, alive is not an option. And hope you get there fast enough with your electric motor since no gas powered outboards are allowed on this lake. Now they probably should have had a cert scale, that would have made things much easier, or just take it in.

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 1:20 pm
by wevans
Lets see, I'm fishing in a lake with a potential world record fish, I am targeting said fish on every trip, do I just lip the fish and drag her back to the dock, do I put her in the boat to die, Or do I use my brain and keep a very strong stringer with me to keep the fish in the water and safe until I can get the thang certified :smt017 Aw hell, it's to much trouble ta keep a stringer on me at all times while fishing :o I'll just wing it, money and fame aint important to me no how :smt004 that's why I target them bigguns, just for the fun of it :smt025 :beer: :beer:

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 1:28 pm
by dstockwell
Just boat the darn thing and bring it in "Dead or Alive" :-D

Re: Potential World-record bass boated in California

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 1:34 pm
by Bailey
Chalk wrote:Dickerson followed in their electric-powered rental boat (all that is permitted for use at the 80-foot-deep reservoir).
It sounds "fishy" to me too, but the guy may not have had a choice as far as livewell goes.

Bailey :beer:

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 2:00 pm
by wevans
Again, no livewell, no problem :-D Use a stringer or
Image

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 2:09 pm
by RHTFISH
Who knows?

It's a shame there's so much "economic" consideration regarding
a new record. I've never been convinced about the existing
record holder, especially considering there have been no reports
of large bass caught in that some geographic environment that even
approach "record" proportions. At least the CA area has produced
some real heavyweights in recent years.

When I bass fish I do keep a written record of my rod, reel, line,
bait, shoes, socks, pants, belt, shirt, underwear, hat, glasses and
sunglasses, after shave, bug repellant, where I ate breakfast,
soft drinks aboard, snacks, ice chest, tackle box, boat, outboard, electric,
net, truck, trailer, winch, paddle, cricket box, anticipated adult
beverages at the end of day, favorite steakhouse, etc., and any other important piece of info that might provide an endorsement!
:o

Posted: March 21st, 2006, 3:26 pm
by Jumptrout51
TroutTrent wrote:Got to agree BS. I'm all about catch and release but come on there's a million dollar award and all the benefits that go with it right now and your going to throw it back,,yea right. Even the dumbest fisherman like Jt51, Chalk or Tin wouldn't do something like that..or would you?
I keep telling ya'll. It ain't about the money.



ONE MILLION $





YEA,RIGHT!!!