Gulf Fisheries Fairness Act

[Dubble Trubble]

If this passes, is it going to be good or bad? Looks like it will transfer deeper waters to state management. I am betting the Feds will fight it tooth and nail.

http://www.wtxl.com/news/southerland-in ... 0f31a.html

Dubble

[Scoop Sea]

I for one think it's a good thing. I wrote up a Resolution for the Wakulla County Board of Commissioners to vote on this evening and it got tabled because there was some concern that it may negatively impact commercial fishermen. My understanding of the Act indicates it could help both commercial and recreational fishermen. To me it's this simple: make the regulations at the lowest level of government possible (that has the ability to make the decisions based on science and "real world" data).

Nine miles off of Pensacola, PC, etc is a whole lot different than 9 miles in my neck of the woods, let's look at the fishery management in a holistic fashion at the State level and set the limits from there.

Here's the Act as proposed:

H.R. 1219: To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide that each of the States of Texas, ...
...Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida have exclusive fishery management authority over reef fish in the Gulf of Mexico in

113th Congress, 2013–2015. Text as of Mar 15, 2013 (Introduced).

Status & Summary | PDF | Source: GPO

HR 1219 IH

113th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1219

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide that each of the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida have exclusive fishery management authority over reef fish in the Gulf of Mexico in waters that, on average, are 20 fathoms or less in depth, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 15, 2013


Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide that each of the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida have exclusive fishery management authority over reef fish in the Gulf of Mexico in waters that, on average, are 20 fathoms or less in depth, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Gulf Fisheries Fairness Act’.

SEC. 2. STATE EXCLUSIVE FISHERY MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY OVER REEF FISH IN THE GULF OF MEXICO.
(a) In General- The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act is amended--

(1) in section 101 (16 U.S.C. 1811)--

(A) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘and subsection (c) of this section’ after ‘section 102’; and

(B) by adding at the end the following:

‘(c) State Exclusive Fishery Management Authority Over Reef Fish in the Gulf of Mexico-

‘(1) IN GENERAL- Each of the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida shall have exclusive fishery management authority over all Gulf reef fish in all waters that are--

‘(A) within the exclusive economic zone in the Gulf of Mexico;

‘(B) not further from shore than the line described under paragraph (2); and

‘(C) between the projected lines determined for that State under section 4(a)(2)(A) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1333(a)(2)(A)).

‘(2) DESCRIPTION OF LINE-

‘(A) IN GENERAL- The Secretary shall publish a description of, and map showing, a continuous line in waters of the exclusive economic zone in the Gulf of Mexico along the coasts of the States referred to in paragraph (1), that is comprised of points that are, on average, 20 fathoms in depth.

‘(B) MINIMUM DISTANCE- No point on such line shall be less than 9 nautical miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea of the United States is measured.

‘(3) PROHIBITION ON LIMITING AUTHORITY TO FISH UNDER FEDERAL LAW- The Secretary may not suspend, revoke, terminate, or otherwise limit the authority of any person under Federal law to engage in fishing, based on fishing by the person for Gulf reef fish in waters that are subject to the exclusive fishery management authority of a State under this subsection.

‘(4) GULF REEF FISH DEFINED- In this subsection the term ‘Gulf reef fish’ means all fish listed in table 3 of appendix A to part 622 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this subsection).’; and

(2) in section 302(a)(1)(E) (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1)(E)), by inserting ‘of this subsection and section 101(c)’ after ‘paragraph (3)’.

(b) Deadline- The Secretary of Commerce shall publish the 20-fathom line description and map required under the amendment made by subsection (a)(1) by not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) Termination of Application of More Restrictive Federal Regulations- Sections 622.4(a)(1)(iv) and 622.4(a)(2)(v) of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and any substantially similar regulation, shall not apply with respect to waters described in section 101(c)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by this section.

[MudDucker]

With the present administration, if a bill has the word "fairness" in it, I sit down. I do this so that the part of my body that they feel is fair to pillage is not exposed.

In this case, the administration did not propose it and will instead oppose it, because it reduces the emperors powers. I think that would be a good thing.