
With the FWC approval, looks like it's going to be law soon.
Moderators: bman, Chalk, Tom Keels
My only issue is that above a 25% SPR is considered healthy and the current 35% was just made up, personally I believe that the scale should have been slid below 15in and keep the limit at 5 while removing some of the 20+ fish.silverking wrote:I had a conflict with the workshop date, but I submitted comments a couple times as well. Some are being considered while others are not. Can't have everything but my philosophy is the Commission should always err on the side of the resource and conservation.
It's hard for me to comprehend the outlook mentality of losing a few bucks in the short term. If stocks are overfished and collapse, visiting anglers are going to go elsewhere and then the motels, restaurants and guides are really going to be hurting. Let the brood stock rebound to healthy levels and everyone benefits.
Strong agreement.silverking wrote:I had a conflict with the workshop date, but I submitted comments a couple times as well. Some are being considered while others are not. Can't have everything but my philosophy is the Commission should always err on the side of the resource and conservation.
It's hard for me to comprehend the outlook mentality of losing a few bucks in the short term. If stocks are overfished and collapse, visiting anglers are going to go elsewhere and then the motels, restaurants and guides are really going to be hurting. Let the brood stock rebound to healthy levels and everyone benefits.