MudDucker wrote:I meant to say "some" of the worst urban sprawl, not the worst. Eddie Joe, the sprawl of Miami and now of all places, the Ocala area, are oft shown as examples of some of the worst urban sprawl in America. Tampa's water problems are so bad, they are experimenting with desalinization of sea water.
I'm having a hard time figuring out why you seem to want to defend Atlanta's development patterns. I sure wouldn't defend some down here. To put a point on it, Atlanta rates first as worst urban sprawl example. There are several that make the list in Florida, too, and being on a list like this is no "honor". Personally, I hate what development has done to the Florida of my youth. Between yankees coming from the North and latins from the South "my Florida" is in deep trouble from invaders and aliens.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
According to the Sierra Club, here are the cities with the worst urban sprawl:
Cities of 1 million or more people (20): Atlanta, St. Louis, Washington D.C., Cincinnati, Kansas City, Denver, Seattle, Minneapolis-St.Paul, Ft. Lauderdale, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Cleveland, Tampa, Dallas, Hampton Roads, Pittsburgh, Miami, San Antonio, Riverside-St. Bernardino, CA
Cities of 500,000 to 1 million people (5): Orlando; Austin, TX; Las Vegas; West Palm Beach, FL; Akron, OH
Cities of 200,000 to 500,000 (5): McAllen, TX; Raleigh; Pensacola, FL; Daytona Beach, FL; Little Rock; AS
The Sierra Club did not include Los Angeles in its ranking, although it said the city is acknowledged to be “the granddaddy of sprawl.â€